I don t know what all the fuss is about, trying to sign this striker or that striker, back in the good old days the hammers used to compromise, they made a half back into a forward (Geoff Hurst), Bonds played midfield or defence, we supplied the core of E

I don't know what all the fuss is about, trying to sign this striker or that striker, back in the good old days the hammers used to compromise, they made a half back into a forward (Geoff Hurst), Bonds played midfield or defence, we supplied the core of England's world cup winning team at a transfer cost of zero, so why is it in this day and age has there got to be all kinds of money spent. is Ferdinand better than Moore, is Berbatov better than Hurst, Man Utd spent 60 million on those two, West Ham spent nothing on theirs way back, utilse what we've got there could be some surprises!