Search

Stephen Port: Coroner will not face investigation in fresh inquest

PUBLISHED: 07:00 16 July 2019

Stephen Port

Stephen Port

Archant

The coroner who examined the deaths of two of Stephen Port’s victims will not be investigated, a judge has ruled.

Stephen Port's victims clockwise from top left: Gabriel Kovari, Daniel Whitworth, Jack Taylor and  Anthony Walgate. Picture: Met Police.Stephen Port's victims clockwise from top left: Gabriel Kovari, Daniel Whitworth, Jack Taylor and Anthony Walgate. Picture: Met Police.

Her honour, Judge Sarah Munro, rejected arguments from lawyers acting for the families of the four young gay men murdered by the Barking serial killer that Nadia Persaud, senior coroner for east London, should appear at a fresh inquest.

Judge Munro, acting as assistant coroner for that inquest, wrote: "I am not permitted to explore the conduct of another coroner".

Ms Persaud reached an open verdict into the deaths of Gabriel Kovari, 22, and Daniel Whitworth, 21. Port's final victims were Anthony Walgate, 23, and Jack Taylor, 25, from Dagenham.

Her conclusion was quashed at the High Court after the 44-year-old chef was jailed for life for murder in 2016.

Port drugged and murdered his victims before dumping their bodies in or around St Margaret's Chruch, Barking. Picture: MPSPort drugged and murdered his victims before dumping their bodies in or around St Margaret's Chruch, Barking. Picture: MPS

Paul Clark and Dr Anton van Dellen, acting for the families and Daniel's former partner, Ricky Waumsley, urged Judge Munro to examine "shortcomings" in Ms Persaud's investigation at a preliminary July 5 Old Bailey hearing to agree the inquest's scope.

You may also want to watch:

These included concerns over whether Ms Persaud sufficiently investigated whether the bodies had been moved; the authenticity of a suicide note, later revealed as fake; and Daniel's movements before his death.

Andrew O'Connor QC, counsel to the inquests, and Peter Skelton QC, for the Met, had argued that Judge Munro could not investigate Ms Persaud.

In her written ruling published after the hearing, Judge Munro disagreed with Mr Clark's argument that since Ms Persaud's open conclusions were overruled, her decisions could no longer be respected.

Judge Munro described his argument as "flawed" saying it would be wrong for her to challenge a judicial officer of the same rank.

Mr Clarke's second argument that the quality of Ms Persaud's investigation into the deaths could be examined separately from her role as a judge was also dismissed.

A third argument Judge Munro should investigate the coroner's office's conduct in relation to the preservation of life under Article 2 of the Europena Convention on Human Rights was dismissed as beyond her powers.

"[T]he scope of these inquests will have at its heart any failings or missed opportunities by police (and possibly others) to investigate matters which might have prevented one or more of the later deaths", Judge Munro stated.


If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Barking and Dagenham Post. Click the link in the orange box above for details.

Related articles

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Comments have been disabled on this article.

Latest from the Barking and Dagenham Post