Stephen Port inquests: Senior cop wishes he 'pushed further' for murder investigation
Emily Pennink, PA Old Bailey Correspondent
- Credit: Met Police
Another senior police officer has expressed regret he didn't push harder for specialist murder detectives to take over the investigation into Stephen Port’s first victim.
Anthony Walgate, a 23-year-old fashion student, was found dead outside serial killer Port’s flat in Barking on June 19, 2014 after being given a fatal dose of GHB.
Port had alerted emergency services anonymously, claiming he was a passerby, then lied to police about the circumstances of Mr Walgate’s death.
On June 26, in an email to senior colleagues, Temporary Det Ch Insp Tony Kirk wrote: “Anthony Walgate appears to be organised and experienced in his activities and has a group of friends who are obviously concerned at the manner in which he has died as, I am sure, so are his parents and family.
“I feel we as an organisation have a duty to his friends and family to get to the bottom of his death in what are increasingly suspicious circumstances.”
Mr Kirk’s lawyer, Richard Atchley, asked what he was hoping to achieve.
He replied: “I hoped the superintendent and MIT (murder investigation team) would accept my rationale and take on the investigation.”
That did not happen and none of the people he emailed responded.
- 1 Barking MP Margaret Hodge 'will not stand' in next general election
- 2 ‘He put his life into family’: Tributes paid to former builder who died of Covid
- 3 Homophobia ruled out for jury in Stephen Port victims’ inquests
- 4 Barking cash and carry boss jailed for five years for money laundering
- 5 Travel: What to watch out for across Havering, Redbridge and Barking and Dagenham
- 6 Barking was Britain's ninth most used station in 2020/21, figures show
- 7 Members of Mali Boys gang jailed for supplying Class A drugs into Essex
- 8 There With You This Winter: Mayor offers £51m of funding for fuel poverty
- 9 What are the chances of a white Christmas in London?
- 10 Strike action will hit Central and Victoria line Night Tube services this weekend
Mr Atchley asked: “Did you feel as acting DCI you were in a position to push it further at that time?”
Mr Kirk replied: “No.”
His lawyer continued: “With the benefit of hindsight, do you wish you had done so?”
The witness replied: “Yes.”
Mr Kirk told the court that staff had been “stressed” and “overworked”, with some reduced to tears, creating an atmosphere in which errors were made.
There were mistakes in sharing intelligence with colleagues about Port, not instructing a search on the police national database about him, and not sending his laptop off for scrutiny until nearly a year after he first struck, jurors have heard.
Mr Kirk had allocated an inspector to supervise the investigation, but he stepped back “almost immediately”, the court was told.
Peter Skelton QC for the Metropolitan Police asked Mr Kirk if he was disappointed by that.
Mr Kirk said: “Now knowing the outcomes, most definitely.”
Mr Skelton said: “Checking that actions were completed would be a basic fundamental part of its supervision.
"If that does not take place, errors are made.”
Mr Kirk agreed.
Mr Skelton said: “So far as the actions such as searching for PND intelligence or searching the laptop, do you have any answer why they were not completed? It appears to be human error.”
Mr Kirk said: “I do not know why they were not checked.”
This comes after both Acting Det Insp Eugene McCarthy and Det Sgt Martin O’Donnell apologised to the family over the investigation, and Temporary Supt Mike Hamer signalled his disappointment about what happened.
The court has heard that during his 16-month killing spree, Port also gave fatal GHB doses to Gabriel Kovari, 22, Daniel Whitworth, 21, and Jack Taylor, 25, before he was caught.
Port, now 46, was handed a whole life prison term in 2016 upon conviction.
The inquests at Barking Town Hall are looking at whether police mistakes prevented Port from being stopped sooner.