Tower Hamlets Council loses Court of Appeal foster care fight
Tower Hamlets Council has failed in a bid to have a landmark legal ruling against its “discriminatory” foster care policy overturned.
The council appealed a High Court decision which found that its policy of paying carers who are related to the children they foster less than those who are not was unlawful.
But the appeal was thrown out by judges in the Court of Appeal this month.
The woman who brought the case – who cannot be named for legal reasons – complained after being paid less than an unrelated foster parent would be for looking after three of her brother’s children, all of whom have learning difficulties.
Despite being blind in one eye, the woman gave up her job and moved house to care for the “demanding and exhausting” children at the request of Tower Hamlets Council.
You may also want to watch:
She was by described by High Court judge Mr Justice Males as “one of the unsung heroines of our society”.
The local authority appealed March’s ruling that she should be paid the same as an unrelated carer would be, saying it wished to “clarify the issue”.
- 1 RSPCA appeal over video of dog 'carried' by collar in Dagenham
- 2 Images released of man in connection with robbery on train from Barking
- 3 Barking fishmongers shut down by council after Covid-19 safety warning
- 4 Council denies Barking mum's claim that it took hours to respond to flood
- 5 'Terrifying' CCTV footage shows vandals take axes to cars of NHS workers
- 6 Fines for Havering landlords who put Dagenham tenants 'in danger'
- 7 Appeal for help to find boy missing from Dagenham
- 8 Call to change 'cash cow' yellow box junction in Marks Gate
- 9 Dagenham charity set up in memory of 'unique' man offers help to youngsters
- 10 Jailed: Dagenham man for role in 'brutal' attack on off-duty police officer
Speaking after the Court of Appeal threw out the council’s case, the woman’s lawyer, Rebecca Chapman, said: “It has been a long battle but I am absolutely delighted for my client.
“She will have enough money to be able to continue to care for the three very demanding children.”
The local authority said it was not the only one to interpret government guidelines in a way deemed discriminatory.
The ruling is set to pave the way for thousands of other carers across the country who look after relatives’ loved ones receiving up to double their present level of financial support.
A council spokesman said: “We are pleased that the regulations around payments to kinship foster carers have now been clarified and will amend our payment schemes accordingly.”
The council was unable to confirm how much money was spent pursuing the case.