Christmas of uncertainty for NHS blood victims as government delays again
- Credit: Supplied, Nigel Sutton and Archant staff photographer
Victims of the contaminated blood scandal face a Christmas of uncertainty as the government has once again delayed making amends for decades of suffering.
Local residents are among 7,500 nationally who were infected with HIV and hepatitis C (hep C) from high-risk blood products supplied by the NHS up until 1991 and have lived in ill-health ever since.
Campaigners have been fighting for 30 years for a public enquiry into the scandal and for a proper system of compensation and support for those whose lives were torn apart.
Yesterday, during an urgent debate in the House of Commons, health minister Jane Ellison admitted the timetable for reforming systems of support for victims, described as “completely unfit for purpose”, has slipped again.
“I recognise that I committed in earlier debates to consulting on proposals to reform the current payment schemes before the end of the year,” she said.
“Despite our best efforts to meet that commitment, we are unfortunately not ready to publish the consultation before the recess. However, I confirm today that it will be published in January.
“The delay will, I know, be disappointing for many who were anticipating the consultation before the end of the year.
- 1 70 firefighters tackle Dagenham house fire
- 2 Council leader on the borough's future, CPZs and receiving death threats
- 3 Dagenham cat with misshapen eye struggles to find home
- 4 Cycling festival coming to Barking
- 5 'Staffing crisis' means children's hospice cannot offer end of life care
- 6 Schools and staff across east London up for national awards
- 7 How the proposed energy price cap changes could affect your bills
- 8 Baby boy died from 'whiplash' injuries caused by shaking, trial hears
- 9 Boy, 5, dies after 'unexplained' incident off Heathway
- 10 Dagenham woman to face trial on numerous robbery charges
“I apologise for the delay, in particular to Members of the House who have been campaigning tirelessly for a resolution on behalf of their constituents and to those who are directly affected, who continue to wait patiently for our proposals.”
Earlier this year prime minister David Cameron apologised on behalf of the government for the tragedy and promised £25million support for victims immediately and to increase that after the general election in May.
But the money has not been released and announcements were first delayed until after the summer recess of Parliament, then until after the chancellor’s Autumn Spending Review, and then again until the end of this year before yesterday’s further hold-up.
It brings yet more agony for those who have lost their health or loved ones to the scandal, as they face another Christmas without proper financial support.
Three of Angela Farrugia’s brothers died horrific deaths after being infected with contaminated blood, including former merchant navy man Victor Farrugia of East Ham and gas technician Barry Farrugia of Dagenham.
She has been fighting for support for her brothers’ children and said of the continued delays in November: “I feel this is so unfair for my nieces and nephews who have had their fathers taken from them.”
Her brothers were among 7,500 in the UK with the blood disorder haemophilia who contracted HIV or hep C following a deadly medical oversight in which blood products from high risk donors, such as drug addicts and prisoners, were given to NHS patients.
Others were infected through blood transfusions, such as Dagenham grandmother-of-five Brenda Buzer who died of irreversible liver cirrhosis caused by hep C without ever receiving a penny in compensation.
Her husband Stan said days before her death in August: “The only thing that I’m really angry about is that Brenda won’t get a few quid to sort her out. It didn’t happen and it just makes me feel angry.”
Diana Johnson MP, chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Haemophilia and Contaminated Blood, told the Commons yesterday: “On three occasions, ministers promised a statement before Christmas. When the minister speaks about a consultation in January, I assume that she means January 2016.
“I would like clarification on that, because dates always seem to slip, and such action from the government fuels distrust and resentment among people who have been let down for too long.”