Council leader demands government ends policy which is forcing him to make £70m worth of cuts
- Credit: Archant
The leader of Barking and Dagenham Council has demanded the government end its “catastrophic” austerity policy.
Councillor Darren Rodwell is one of 23 UK council leaders who signed an open letter which said local authorities could not go on providing “essential services” if budgets continued to be slashed.
The “Councils against Austerity” campaign was launched on Monday at the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool.
An estimated £5.8billion has been cut from council budgets since 2010, it claimed.
In 2015 Mr Rodwell’s cabinet agreed to almost half its expenditure from £150million to £80m by 2020.
You may also want to watch:
In its letter to Whitehall chiefs the campaign stated: “We call upon the government to recognise the catastrophic impact which eight years of uninterrupted austerity has had on local government.
“Budget restrictions have meant losses of almost 50 per cent for councils across the country.
- 1 Drivers escape injury in Dagenham crash
- 2 Man, 20, found stabbed in Barking
- 3 Eid prayer recited outside Barking Town Hall as groups call for more worship spaces
- 4 Groomed girl speaks out after 'dangerous' Barking dealer who dealt Class A drugs in East End is jailed
- 5 Former east London police sergeant sentenced after pleading guilty to harassment
- 6 Antisocial behaviour patrols in Barking and Dagenham
- 7 Teen 'robbed at knifepoint' in Chadwell Heath
- 8 'Love Island promo' spotted filming in Barking
- 9 'Singling out developers to sort out the cladding scandal'
- 10 Column: Pride and trust continues to grow in Dagenham squad
“This has had disastrous knock-on impacts for services, as the stop-gaps that were once in place to prevent destitution have been stripped back.
“Already, a number of councils have cut their services to a statutory minimum, with more likely to follow in the coming months and years.”
The group calling on the government to allow “more freedom for local authorities to set taxes, retain local revenue and allow the proceeds of growth to be kept locally.”
It added: “We need movement away from funding via ring-fenced grants, and towards allowing more discretion and local democratic oversight over spending by local authorities.”