Council leader demands government ends policy which is forcing him to make £70m worth of cuts
- Credit: Archant
The leader of Barking and Dagenham Council has demanded the government end its “catastrophic” austerity policy.
Councillor Darren Rodwell is one of 23 UK council leaders who signed an open letter which said local authorities could not go on providing “essential services” if budgets continued to be slashed.
The “Councils against Austerity” campaign was launched on Monday at the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool.
An estimated £5.8billion has been cut from council budgets since 2010, it claimed.
In 2015 Mr Rodwell’s cabinet agreed to almost half its expenditure from £150million to £80m by 2020.
You may also want to watch:
In its letter to Whitehall chiefs the campaign stated: “We call upon the government to recognise the catastrophic impact which eight years of uninterrupted austerity has had on local government.
“Budget restrictions have meant losses of almost 50 per cent for councils across the country.
- 1 Work to begin on river bus pier at Barking Riverside
- 2 Teenage pedestrian in hospital after Dagenham crash
- 3 Work begins on £1.8m arts centre transformation in Barking
- 4 Ricardo Fuller death: Third man charged with murder
- 5 Man, 19, stabbed in thigh in Dagenham
- 6 East London travel disruption round-up for the week ahead
- 7 Man praises community spirit after flood water threatens homes in Dagenham
- 8 Parkrun returns to east London: Where can you join in?
- 9 Man charged with murder after fatal Dagenham assault
- 10 Murder investigation in Dagenham after man dies in street
“This has had disastrous knock-on impacts for services, as the stop-gaps that were once in place to prevent destitution have been stripped back.
“Already, a number of councils have cut their services to a statutory minimum, with more likely to follow in the coming months and years.”
The group calling on the government to allow “more freedom for local authorities to set taxes, retain local revenue and allow the proceeds of growth to be kept locally.”
It added: “We need movement away from funding via ring-fenced grants, and towards allowing more discretion and local democratic oversight over spending by local authorities.”