Why weren't theft pupils sent to trial?
FUMING parents have slammed the criminal justice system after pupils behind a suspected �1,000 phone, iPod and Oyster card school theft escaped prosecution. They attacked the Crown Prosecution Service for failing to bring a year 10 and a GCSE pupil before
FUMING parents have slammed the criminal justice system after pupils behind a suspected �1,000 phone, iPod and Oyster card school theft escaped prosecution.
They attacked the Crown Prosecution Service for failing to bring a year 10 and a GCSE pupil before the courts after seven students had items stolen from changing rooms at Eastbrook Comprehensive, Dagenham Road.
CCTV was available, some valuables were returned, and the suspected thieves were immediately removed from school.
Denise Pitcher, 44, of Bainbridge Road, Dagenham, whose 16-year-old son lost �100 worth of items, said parents were furious.
Eastbrook headteacher Valerie Dennis also expressed surprise after the case was dropped by the CPS on Thursday. Police stressed one of the youths had been given a reprimand.
Mrs Pitcher said: "I and some other parents are fuming because that doesn't help us to get our sons' property back, and the boys get off scot-free.
- 1 ‘It is not tolerated’: CCTV images released after West Ham game disorder
- 2 Travel Bulletin: Havering, Redbridge, Barking and Dagenham
- 3 Historic fleet of vehicles moving from Dagenham, Ford confirms
- 4 Car park murder: Victim's wife tells trial about the last text he sent her
- 5 Revealed: Cause of Dagenham house fire
- 6 Man run over four times embroiled in row over £40,000, murder trial told
- 7 Ex-soldier launches business to help veterans 'regain their identity'
- 8 Five arrested for drugs offences after dawn raids
- 9 Man in hospital after Dagenham stabbing
- 10 House badly damaged by blaze in Dagenham
"It's no good going for a private prosecution - it's too expensive. A solicitor won't take it on if the CPS won't entertain it. So where do we go from here?"
The school said the pupils had not been expelled, as one was studying at a special tuition centre and the other studying from home.
Ms Dennis said: "The school regrets this unusual, one-off incident. We immediately took action. The police investigated with all the students and the staff and they gave statements.
"Some of the belongings were returned. I'm unsure why there was not enough evidence to see it through.".
A spokesman for the CPS said: "There must be enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction. Secondly, it must be in the public interest to proceed. If these criteria are not met, we will not proceed to charge.